Register To Comment
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Featherweight FBS, What do I need?

  1. #1

  2. #2
    You will struggle to fit all that in the weight limit. I'd drop two of the drill motors and one of the sabretooths. You won't need 4 as you're not building a rammer.

    You won't need a BEC (battery eliminator circuit) as the sabretooth will be able to power your receiver. I'm going to assume you meant a radio controlled relay (ie battleswitch) and solid state relay for the weapon?

    Two speed 900s will be more than enough to power the weapon. Unless you go for uber high spec nimh you won't be able to power 3 speed 900s and drive effectively. A speed 900 is a pretty heavy motor as well.

    Throw together some drawings and post them up. Easiest way to see what you have in mind

  3. #3

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder arrow
    but put the left wheel at the top of the baseplate
    Doesn't really matter to be honest, you can put one motor at the top left and bottom right, or top right and bottom left.

    If you use this method, your robot will rock slightly along the diagonal. A couple of skid pads on your baseplate on opposite sides from your drill motors will reduce that and provide a little stability. The diagonal drive-mount method also makes it slightly easier to drive in a straight line as there is more friction to prevent the robot from veering off.

    On that subject, that is what a gyro does. If you push straight forward on your joystick, your robot should drive in a straight line. But some robots veer off (usually due to one motor running faster than the other) however a gyro will detect this and make small adjustments to keep the robot running in a straight line. I personally wouldn't bother with one; they're only really useful if you've got a very fast drive system or if you're a rubbish driver, and the latter can be solved with a bit of driving practice.

  6. #6
    What do you mean by motors? If you mean the drive motors then yeah you can mount them at either end of the chassis. That's what we did with typhoon cadet (the featherweight one) http://www.rampagingchariots.org.uk/typ ... robots.php

    It can actually help and make it easier to allow the robot to travel in a straight line. It does make it slightly harder for the robot to turn in a circle as the wheels have to slip but drill motors won't notice it.

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Belt drive from two motors so that you have four-wheel-drive is certainly an option. This is the inside of Little Spinner 4, which uses that method (photo borrowed from Dave W's collection ):



    Or you could go for the two idling wheels that can be seen in the internal pic of Typhoon Cadet that Gary linked to. Four-wheel-drive will give you more precise control (in my opinion) and will also increase grip (handy if your weapon breaks and you need to push) but just having two drive wheels is still a good compromise if fiddling with belt drives isn't ideal.

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Lol I drove the machines, I was lucky enough to have a group of professional engineers build the machines for me

    Team typhoon operated like an F1 team, I worried about driving and the other guys in the team worried about keeping them running.

Register To Comment

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •