Quote Originally Posted by kane

Sadly, despite doing all we could and taking the case all the way to the high-court, the judge decided that it was actually immaterial whether or not the owner was or was not negligent in destroying the set. In his view the set had little/no commercial value, he believed that the sport was €˜dead€™ and that it was nothing more than a €˜historic memento€™.

It should be noted that the article in the Telegraph does not give the full story. Robot Arenas had not left it in an unlocked building, and Robot Arenas responded within 24hrs to a request to move the set following the handover of the site to new owners.
So theres 3 things wrong in what the judge said ? Locked building, response in 24 hours and value of the arena (the polycarb alone) waaay over 250 gbp.
Uk justice system = wow.