Register To Comment
Page 28 of 96 FirstFirst ... 1826272829303878 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 960

Thread: UK Kilobots - 1.362kg (3 lbs) Combat Robots

  1. #271
    That's excellent Andy. Supplied data is one thing but it doesn't beat real results from real testing. Anything more you learn about that model of servo would be welcomed
    I'm definitely not expecting fast-flip speeds, but as you say, with a suitable ratio I can hopefully get something reasonably effective. For a first kilobot it will certainly be a learning experience!

    Ewan, the lack of metal gears caught my eye too and it is something that I will be monitoring. Once it's all built I think several test flips will be in order to see how the gears stand up. If they aren't up to the task, I think there are less powerful servos (still in the region of 12kg/cm) on the Giant Cod site that have metal gearing, so that's a back-up for the moment.

    Just want to say too, although I've not built much so far, what I have done has taken less than an hour of construction time. I thoroughly enjoy featherweights but it's nice building something smaller that doesn't require as much 'heavy-handed' tooling (for lack of a better description). Whether the construction is strong enough to stand up to some of the brushless spinners that are being designed/built remains to be seen

  2. #272
    It's looking very good so far I must say

    I've had some good results from using slightly overvolted servos in front hinge flippers at antweight level - you've seen Jigsaw before and the mechanism on that works quite well despite having no real design thought at all going into it, although I'd advise beefing up all parts of the linkage including attachment points and hinges because if you do design it well and optimise it for maximum flip, there's a good chance the mechanism might have quite a kick in it towards the end of its travel or even lock up. Unless you model the lengths beforehand in CAD or card (which I anticipate you will being a better designer than me, heh) trial and error is the key to getting it right, and I had a fair bit of error :P

  3. #273
    Lego released the protocols that they use http://www.philohome.com/pf/LEGO_Pow...ns_RC_v110.pdf

    Aparently the IR reciever can support pwm but I it's where 4 bit binary number is sent with 0001 as full forwards, 1000 as brake and 1111 as full backwards.

    I would probably have to buy one to test what wire does what and whether anything has to be done to the radio transmitters signal to make it work.

  4. #274
    Quote Originally Posted by joeychevron
    Unless you model the lengths beforehand in CAD or card (which I anticipate you will being a better designer than me, heh) trial and error is the key to getting it right

    Me model the lengths in CAD? I'm useless at that stuff! I can make simple CAD images for getting an idea of how a robot will look but that's about it
    No the flipper linkage will indeed be a whole heap of trial and error; pretty much a case of
    *drill hole here* *test* *not that great*
    *drill hole there* *test* *hmm, a bit better*
    Lather, rinse and repeat

    It was actually seeing Jigsaw's mechanism as well as some vids of it in action that made me want to make a front-hinge flipper and then a combination of being a Cassius II fan and not wanting my robot to look like a rip-off of Jigsaw/Envy that made my mind up about building a mini replica of Cassius II

  5. #275
    so instead of making it look like another robot and people saying hmmmm thats a copy your going from the start 'guys this is copy' so no-one can saw anything hahahahahah

  6. #276
    Hmm yeah, having just re-read that it doesn't quite make sense!
    Although I guess I could argue that Jigsaw and Envy are still active robots whereas Cassius II hasn't fought since 1999/2000? So at least that way I'm making a replica of an iconic robot from the past (not that there's anything wrong with Envy and Jigsaw ) rather than copying a successful modern-day robot

  7. #277

  8. #278

  9. #279

  10. #280
    Quote Originally Posted by daliad100
    What do people think to lego power functions as drive motors?

    According to here the Xl motors have 40 Ncm stall torque, 220 ish rpm (no load, 9V), draw 1.8A when stalled and weigh about 70g and the medium ones have 11 Ncm stall torque, turn at about 400rpm (no load, 9V), draw 0.9A stalled and weigh about 35g.

    I think they are both under 2 in all dimensions and you can probably do something about mounting them using the holes or glue/solvent (pretty sure the majority of lego is made from abs.)

    Ah, you should check out my videos!
    www.youtube.com/ochayedonald

    incidentally, with the rechargable batteries from Lego the heaviest weighs 805g-ish.
    Thought I'm not sure an entire lego construction would stand up to metal constructions!

Register To Comment

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •