FRA elections 2009

**fwsorg** · 9th February 2009, 15:39

Tune in next week... where all will be revelled!...

Mr Stu

Spelling mistake or Freudian Slip? Under the circumstances its difficult to decide.

**kane** · 9th February 2009, 16:11

Knowing Stu, its just a typo, but knowing Stu, it might not be!

**craig_colliass** · 9th February 2009, 16:20

Thanks Tim would this be correct

1/ Ed was himself a member of the FRA in the past. (He had his own card and membership number.)
2/ Ed held an office of some sort in the FRA.
3/ Ed did something that lead to him being stripped of his office/status, and banned from the FRA forum (what ever it was dose not matter at this moment.)
4/ Edâ‚¬â„¢s team was not banned from the forum because the problem the FRA had was down to one person Ed.
5/ Ed wants to stand for the position of President of the FRA He qualifies as a member, because he is a member of a team, that in turn is a member of the FRA.

Dose that fit the facts.
Thanks

Craig

**stu** · 9th February 2009, 16:22

typo as i had to hit send quickly before boss came bk.. lol. but still this story just gets bigger. Kane, does this forum have a database backend or is it all text file based?

Mr Stu

**kane** · 9th February 2009, 16:24

Text based Stu.

**stu** · 9th February 2009, 17:05

There goes that idea out the window then.

Mr Stu

**Mouldy** · 10th February 2009, 17:00

Another quetion to the FRA- how come people who signed up for the FRA who didnt have FRA membership last year are allowed to vote for every other position apart from president and chairman? I signed up at the ealyest possible chance ive had (last saterday)

I was a member last year, but not individualy- i was part of a team.

**anukhet** · 10th February 2009, 17:34

Dave, you have mail.
Please everyone, if you ask me a question directly via email at least give me the opportunity to reply before putting it on the forum. I dont consider that a reply in less than half an hour isnt bad going!

(Message edited by anukhet on February 10, 2009)