Register To Comment
Page 54 of 169 FirstFirst ... 444525354555664104154 ... LastLast
Results 531 to 540 of 1682

Thread: How Could I Improve...

  1. #531
    So says the creator of Acid Burn...

  2. #532
    JERRY! JERRY! JERRY!

  3. #533
    quote:

    So says the creator of Acid Burn...

    Proves my point even more. Was so easy to bend the rules and get that design in. One of my other rule bending designs was a robot that was a walker and a wheeled robot. Would start the battle as a slow 5MPH walker, then flip itself over and drive around as a 20MPH wheeled bot @ 150-200kg... 50kg flywheel FTW

    Another good example is Blizzard... Screw drives are effectively another form of omniwheels... Yet, bend the rules quiet nicely if I do say so myself :wink:

  4. #534
    So youre not going to make MDU4.1 a 200kg walker again, as planned?

  5. #535
    Lol.
    No, 1.0 was the last of the walking MDUs.
    2.0 never left the paper (expanding rim design).
    3.0 - 4.0 MDU series are translational spinners... More then likely, 4.1 will a cylindrical 2 wheel translational spinner, driven on series wound motors, with active adjustible teeth and a lot of Hardox....

    Depend on my motor selection, it could end up as a 1 wheel translational spinner...

  6. #536
    How exactly would that work?

  7. #537

  8. #538
    Way cool...I think Ill just stick to wedges if I ever build something though

  9. #539
    As to the tracks rule, I believe I was either the first to pitch it or the first to use it - I forget which.... anyway, there were and are several reasons:

    Firstly, no one uses tracks, it was a way of encouraging more.

    Secondly in vapourbots, however much exposed wheels arent treated fairly, tracks have traditionally had it twice as bad through merit that they need to be pretty exposed to function, so in my view the weight is justified.

    Thirdly they are heavier, and there is more to go wrong. Also, bear in mind that they do not necessarily get better traction - in a wheeled bot the traction is improved because the weight is focused into a smaller area, by increasing the area you gain increased friction but decreased force per square inch against the ground (I think anyway)

    Personally I dont intend to do so myself, but I can see the merit in increasing the weight bonus from 10kg to 25kg.

  10. #540
    davids
    Guest
    quote:

    merit that they need to be pretty exposed to function

    Only if you want your machine to be invertible.

Register To Comment

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •