Armory
Make it a bit taller and wider. A rectangle is a 2D shape€¦
Nice to see some variation in the motor and battery department, but I€™m not that familiar with that set-up. Maybe someone else can help, but I would personally change to Magmotors or Lynch motors€¦ 1.4hp for 10kgs of motors doesn€™t look like a good power to weight ratio to me. Correct me if I€™m wrong but I believe the batteries you mention are Hawker Odyssey, which are SLA. I€™d look for some much lighter NiCad or NiMH.
The clearance is very poor. 1mm is bad, but 0.01 of a millimetre? That is, I€™m afraid, very bad. But as you are new, I€™ll let you off. :wink: High ground clearance is not a bad thing to have by any means, in fact, it has many positives. If you are concerned though, add some skirts. But I would times your ground clearance by 1000, personally. It takes something just a fraction of a millimetre to get under your current clearance and you will be beached on it. Wheels off the floor, gone.
5mm Titanium is pretty thin, add a bit more to it or €œlaminate€ it with polycarbonate or HDPE. Or if you€™re not bothered about Craig€™s call for variation, then use Hardox, which is significantly lighter, but also stronger. For the spike you€™ll need to say what its made of, what size ram powers it, what gas you are using, how much gas is stored, what pressure you are running at etc€¦
I€™m also not familiar with the term €œMag Snapper€Â€¦ could you expand on this, please?
Gabriel II
I€™m not sure on the existence of C40-300 Magmotors. I€™m probably wrong but I think you mean C40-500. The armour is a little weak, but fine. Give a few sizes for that hydraulic ram, is possible. Otherwise, a very nice robot. You€™ve been here, what€¦ a month? And you can already produce stats better than some people who have been here for a few years. Good going, Joey.





Bookmarks