I see politicians at work.

The AGM agenda was not the correct version. So when was a correct version to be known? Tomorrow afternoon? So the people who are to be represented by the Elected FRA reprensatives cant put their view in. So the reps have to divine the wishes of the people they represent.

The 17th FRA agenda had named individuals contained in its text and therefore the FRA itself could have been liable under the data protection act.
Depends. Does any of the members mentioned in that document a problem with that fact? Maybe certain individuals that didnt make the proposals in those words and could get annoyed by the misinterpretation? Or people mentioned that didnt even proposed anything.

Like Tim Bauwens for the A123 testing. (and yes, I made sure I was permitted the use of Tims name here)