Geoff - I know a number of spoilers have been posted elsewhere, but thats why Im only reading this forum. People here have been kind enough to tell me not to look at the Five web site, so I havent. Since, surprisingly, there werent any spoilers at the end of the second semi, I genuinely was unaware of any definite results. Anyone who has stated a result so far has done so in the context of an opinion of a likely outcome, not actual knowledge (whether or not they actually knew if they were right).

Since the forum has a policy of not giving out results (Ive not checked the contract to see whether youre not supposed to - although certainly I wasnt asked to keep hush when I was in the audience of Extreme 2), I think its fair to remove one. It was an indirect spoiler, but the information required to infer the result didnt rely on information outside this site. (Hopefully *thats* not a spoiler). Obviously I now know what the spoiler told me, but there may be other readers who have their suspense saved.

There are other things on this site which might be construed as spoilers, but in those cases I cant actually tell until all the results are public. This was different.

However, I wouldnt be too hard on Tom - he was being obscure, and may have been unaware that he wasnt being *as* obscure as he intended to be. Sorry youre in trouble, Tom (you dont have to shut up, but please do be a little careful).

Thanks to admin for sorting the offending post.

--
Fluppet