Register To Comment
Page 8 of 41 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 409

Thread: Power/failsafe LED

  1. #71

  2. #72
    At the risk of sullying my reputation by making my first post (on this forum) one which drags out the debate...

    Regarding the dont attack the link problem. Ive always felt that the goals of having a link which can be easily and safely removed, and of making sure it doesnt fall out in a fight, are mutually exclusive.

    Since events (outside Mentorns control, anyway)allow roboteers to declare when a robot is dead, what would EOs think of allowing a dead robot to be (briefly) inspected, and allowing it to continue fighting if the only thing wrong is that the link is out? (Immediately, I mean - an obligatory rematch would just get tedious).

    Advantage: possibly slightly fairer results (who hasnt felt sorry for a robot disabled by a lucky hit on the link?)

    Disadvantages: might mean trying to insert a link into a damaged robot without proper inspection (although if links are inserted from outside the arena this might not be so bad). Also unworkable for battles between more than two robots.

    Im still only a proto-roboteer, but it strikes me that making a link safe and visible would be a lot easier if having it pulled out by a lucky hit didnt mean the loss of a fight. Maybe a policy of three falls and youre out if someone has a link prone to damage, no as not to hold up the event too much?

    FWIW I approve of the LED (it would also look cool), but Im under no delusions that a dull robot is a safe robot. Id have thought that with a bit of contrasting paint around it (small black circle or something) thered be no problem seeing a modern high-brightness LED in reasonable daylight.

    My original thoughts on the subject were to have a failsafe radio channel on the link (if theres a signal the robots live), but thats both more expensive and even less reliable than the LED; it would allow hidden links and a better range on one indication that the robot is live, though.

  3. #73

  4. #74

  5. #75
    kane's Avatar
    Roboteer

    For reference

    This is the Fighting Robot Association Roboteer Forum, run by roboteers for roboteers. Please keep chat clean and non-offensive. Persistent offenders will be barred.

    Regards
    FRA forum admin team
    Kane Aston
    http://www.makerobotics.com

    Co-owner and builder of BEHEMOTH

  6. #76

  7. #77
    stu's Avatar
    Member

    My God -

    The only rule I have suggested changing is that the safety links are altered so they are removable, in an emergency, using a 10 foot long pole with a hook on the end, and the gas turned off by the same action.
    I will not insist on that this year but will next.

    Any robot that deliberately attacks the link would be disqualified,

    Do hope your having a laugh.

    The safety requirements Roobts have at the moment are good enough. The LED light addition is to help the roobteer and others know if the robot is alive or not when doing anything. A standard lighting rule should be made for the LED lights. A certain light for when the roobt is alive, or just RX on or in failsafe mode.

    You start making and deactivating robots using a 10foot pole - then the hobby turns into who has the best balance skills to pull their link out.

    Tis getting a bit silly now. How about we make RC ejection links. Press a button and your link auto pops out? Anyone for this rule?

    Mr Stu

  8. #78

  9. #79

  10. #80

Register To Comment

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •