Thank you both for your quick replies.
That seems sensible.
As I understand it this means that things like massive kinetic energy weapons a la Carbide arn't suitable. The smaller arenas simply can't contain them. One of the reasons for thinking along the 'armoured axebot' lines.
Hence asking people who know more than me!Doable but keep in mind most competitive machines in robots wars cost three times this at least. No machine in the final has cost less than this. Live events are a different kettle of fish."Target budget £1k."To try and get a feel for what is sensible/doable and what isn't.
People on the show do keep saying about how they built theirs for only a few hundred, but I don't know how much of that is having lost track of how much they did actually spend when you added every up, how much is kinda circumstantial - "Yeah, we used these handy jet engines from a old fighter plane we just happened to have laying around...didn't cost us a penny!" and how much of that is that, yeah - you really can build something that will get you through the door for a few hundred quid. Split that with a teammate, and it's potentially quite an adventure for the cost of a weekend in a B&B. Even if you don't win.
That's what I am thinking of at the moment, yes.I think they just meant it might look like a combination between Chaos 2 and Thor.
Form wise, something quite close to Thor. Lots of diagonal plates and an axe/pick type weapon.
But taking a lot of concept ideas from Chaos 2 and basically trying to build a 100kg bulldoser. Aim to have an advantage in speed and traction and just keep battering other robots around the ring.
I'm not thinking of building some form of uber weapon system that can tears my opponents apart and give me a quick victory. I'm thinking of building something quick enough to be able to relibly close with my opponents and tough enough that three minutes later I can take a judges decision due to having spent the entire match driving at them flat out and hitting them with an axe.
Bookmarks