I like that idea of splitting up the machine, I feel like it would be hard to implement but pretty spectacular if someone made it work. If it were durable or the machine is quick enough enough you could have a pop at the space between a horizontal spinner and its owner.
As a fully qualified armchair expert....
The jumping idea will definately work very well if you can use the full mass of your machine and get on top of those nasty spinning things and just pound away on them.
You might have trouble when you come up against a sloping pyramid thing though.....
Absolutely Craig, what we're finding with our experiments at the moment is getting a form of reliability and predictability with our unit is proving to be more than a little tricky.
Sometimes and I say this as a scientist as well, though certainly not as an engineer, we can be a tad conservative when it comes to exploring new avenues with a tendency to favour improvements on the established and proven.
But hey, even a failed experiment is a form of progress!
That's why I would recommend sharing the idea here as I'm sure you would get actual useful advice.
Instead of jumping , could you not use some flappy whegs instead?
128936.jpg
Always hankered after the idea of climbing onboard and then extruding metal wire into the interior of the robot.
New-2Pcs-Retractable-Wire-Brushes-Jazz-font-b-Drum-b-font-font-b-Sticks-b-font.jpg
Basically a form of the Harlequins Kiss made real for any 40K fans
http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Harlequin's_Kiss
some entanglement is allowed now?
wow, didn't know this before... must have missed it.
Why is this change? spinners getting mighty?^^
Bookmarks