Register To Comment
Page 22 of 31 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 302

Thread: Lithium cell tests

  1. #211
    A small point though:

    Before we focus too much on A123s in particular (which is obvious bacause they are in effect market leader) this is about allowing LiFePo4 for heavies, not A123s alone. There already are more manufacturers out there, some with better specs some with worse, and just like with Nicad and Nimh some will emerge as the best and some will fall short. But none of this is safety related only performance related. The current rules were written in such a way there was no possibility for any Lithium battery to be used including the ones that are not balls of fire waiting to happen. That is why I am in favor of allowing the use of LiFePo4 in heavies.

    In the time to come LiFePo4 batteries will get better and better as they are already becoming more and more commonplace in electric vehicle use and DIY equipment. This has been true of all battery types and so will LiFePo4.

  2. #212

  3. #213

  4. #214
    Hi Paul,
    I wasnt trying to poo poo your results ...I was backing them.

    The link is here.
    http://www.fmadirect.com/support_docs/item_1229.pdf
    http://www.fmadirect.com/support_docs/item_1229.pdf


    Another extract ...copy & paste.

    A123 cells can withstand short bursts at discharge rates up to 33C (33 times
    capacity). Despite outlandish marketing claims of 20C-30C capability, LiPo cells
    struggle to deliver much greater than 15C, and that is accompanied by very short
    life in the range of 50 cycles. Capacity for A123 cells at this time is limited to a
    nominal 2AH.

    2ah 16.5C or 33 Amps not that far away from your test results.

    (Message edited by woody on February 22, 200

  5. #215

  6. #216

  7. #217
    kane's Avatar
    Roboteer

    Hardly, the topic has been actively discussed since it was opened!?
    Kane Aston
    http://www.makerobotics.com

    Co-owner and builder of BEHEMOTH

  8. #218

  9. #219
    kane's Avatar
    Roboteer

    That is my view, there appear to be no safety concerns with the a123 LiFePo4. In fact the technology seems very good even if current discharge is not what some would hope for. Weight for weight the technology seems as good as NiCds even if a little pricy and short lived when abused.

    I for one will be moving to have the battery rules rewritten soon. Especially as the UK championships are looming.
    Kane Aston
    http://www.makerobotics.com

    Co-owner and builder of BEHEMOTH

  10. #220

Register To Comment

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •