Call for a ban on wedges

**craig_anto** · 23rd February 2007, 10:56

why ban wedges? this really winds me up. Its as bad as mentorn saying no robot can compete without a weapon, Saying no wedges would rule out almost all flippers, and previous Robot Wars winners.

Then how do u define a wedge bot? dont be dumb and just say its a wedge shape, we know that, but when does a wedge no longer become a wedge? Terrorhurtz for example can use its front end to wedge under and ram them into walls, i know it can ive been on the receiving end. Is it no longer a wedge when it has a weapon?

But this said a simple wedge bot can still be effective for example at folkestone Tanto went 5-1 wins to loses without a weapon and as a wedgebot, beating the likes of Terrorhurtz and Dominator 3.

Personally I think we need to start looking at this as a sport not a hobby, and as a sport we need to start concentrating on what makes the sport advance not what the public enjoys, i am aware of the fact we need the public support but personally id rather we got our house sorted and the worried about making it a spectical for the public

This has been a party political broad cast from the Wedgebot Party

**big_nipper** · 23rd February 2007, 12:39

Kan-Opener is upto F-Spec, not sure of the full history but as I understood it that will be the 6th full chasis, infact E & F spec are both fully working, would be interesting to see them fight each other

. Very few robots last a few years of constant events.

At Robots live a few weeks back we broke our lifter in the 1st competition fight and still managed to win the event somehow. Our crusher worked but since it was on the floor couldnt use it, does that mean we should be banned as well?

I personally dont like wedges, but as long as they keep winning they wont go away and a doubt any event organiser will ban them as thats where most people start with their first robot and we always need more roboteers. That makes this thread really pointless, why did I bother posting.

**babeth** · 23rd February 2007, 13:00

Not building a wedge is simply one of the many interesting challenges every roboteer cherishes.

Maddox and I would rather go for an abnormal design. That way the public has less trouble remembering who those crazy Flemish are.
But that aside, I think we should be free to use whatever shape we want. Dont put a clamp on creativity ! Rules are needed but too many rules suffocate. (Ive recently joined a political party and -hey lookie!- thats one of their major program points...

)

**leorcc** · 23rd February 2007, 14:12

In short: No we will not ban wedges.

What we will do is encourage as many people as possible that if they do make a wedge, to make it an interesting one.

**geoff** · 23rd February 2007, 15:05

Amen to that Leo.

For the record.. (From the front page of the website)
FRA Aims...
Promotion and education of all things to do with robots,
of all weights, shapes and sizes

Matter closed!

**majinb** · 23rd February 2007, 18:19

Most people have already brought up the point of the effectiveness of wedges, so I wont go into that. Thing is... banning wedges... what bots will be left? Spinners are already out of the picture, and for a good reason, theyre dangerous. Wedges banned, well see no more flippers, no more vertical crushers, no more vertical clampers, no more passive wedges, no more skirts (heck someone could be wedged by them, and whats the point of skirts anyway?) and hardly any axes.
So, some succesfull machines that WOULD be allowed: TAN, Kan-Opener, Stinger, Tornado (with spike setup), Thor... ermz... ermz...