A couple of questions

[alex_holt]

a)Cheeky boy legs are just a waste of time... youll need the weight to get anywhere with them

Not much more so than anarchy, but they ar3e far mroe manouverable.

b)Tracks, EOs disgression....

And that is why I was asking.

c)Screws, when I actually think about it, are more like an omni directional design, they continously rotate to travel like a wheel so I would say the screw method of travelling deserves a wheeled weight limit, nothing more.

Shush! no one else has noticed! *looks inconpicuous*

[andrewj]

I dont agree with the passive weapons rule. That means half the robots cant enter including things like rammers and translational spinners that use their drive as a weapon. Although the rules say nothing about having no weapon, just no passive ones... :wink: Then you get into the bother of people having an active and passive weapon on their robots. Its a whole lot easier to just let passive weaponry be permitted in my opinion.

[mrdaves]

Ok, the anti-passive rule will go...

*Sees 16 passive box wedges enter*

[andrewj]

I certainly wont be entering a rammer because you seem to be unfond of them and write them out of your tournaments in stupid ways.

Make that 15... well under 15 I should think.