-
Autonomous rules?
Is there any weight bonus' (similar to what walkers get) for completely autonomous robots? There's some nice compact Lidar gear out there now and I'm toying with the idea of putting something together, but it wouldn't be worth it without some kind of weight bonus.
-
-
Nothing in there mentions a weight bonus for autonomous robots - so I assume there is none? Could this potentially be something to come into the ruling in some way in the future? I think it would encourage a lot more interesting builds! With all the extra kit that comes with autonomy (and the fact that you'll end up with a half blind dumb robot) it's not worth pursuing without any bonus I think.
-
Semi autonomous cluster bots maybe?
-
I could see semi-autonomous robots having quite an advantage in the future if the autonomy was used practically - e.g. weapon firing dependent on sensors and other factors (e.g. auto self righting with gyros). But as the control isn't too complex I can't see an advantage. Perhaps best to let evolution take its course rather than trying to force it with bias?
-
I regularly compete in the US [long trip!] with autonomous 1 lb and 3 lb machines. They have a class for fully autonomous machines which compete only against other autonomous machines. It's great fun. For heavies at present I think that Will, above, is right. Semi autonomous has potential but you still want to have a person driving the machine. And of course there is the safety aspect - you don't want to come anywhere near an autonomous machine unless it autonomous functions have been switched off and you know they are off.
-
There is no additional weight bonus for autonomous robots.
-
I saw Chomp on battlebots uses a sensor to fire its hammer when an opponent is in range and to keep facing towards its opponent
-
I'm more interested in building a fully autonomous bot. It would use similar tech to chomp though, but the only control I would have is the stop/start button. I wonder if its ok for the bot to communicate to a laptop for calculations, or would it have to do everything on board...
-
For fully auto you could push a lot of comms through a 2.4GHz link although I'm not sure of the specifically allowed comms channels for robot combat. You'd only need to directly activate functions (motors and weapons) so you could have the laptop in the booth. So more like a computer driving it than a completely self contained robot. 3 reasons I can think of for doing it that way -
safety - you can directly intervene with the control of the robot should it be required;
simplicity - the robot could initially be identical to the human controlled one but with an AI moving the sticks;
protection - a laptop or embedded PC (or even a smart phone) likely wouldn't last 1 drop / impact and certainly not several and would be an expensive bit to replace.