I believe he is the only person using a brushless In-runner.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy
Drum weighs about 3Kg, on a ~3:1 ratio giving ~13'000 rpm at the drum and about a 2 second spin up time
Printable View
I believe he is the only person using a brushless In-runner.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy
Drum weighs about 3Kg, on a ~3:1 ratio giving ~13'000 rpm at the drum and about a 2 second spin up time
This Motor; http://www.robotmarketplace.com/product ... N1515.html
This lipo; http://www.robotmarketplace.com/product ... SPP45.html
both of which ive just noticed have been discounted massively since i purchased them :( lol
makes buying replacements better :P
Galactus uses an inrunner.
Touro Feather also uses an inrunner to power it's drum.
Why is it that some opt for inrunners particularly? Smaller diameter? Higher RPM?
I'd have thought the greater torque from an outrunner would be desirable enough to make them steal the show?
@Megamasher
I wouldn't puy an antweight called 90 on your robot wish list' and post on this thread because it is quite likely that dave m will smash it up.
don't say I didn't warn you:)
Its exactly that. Drums need less torque and more speed and discs need less speed but more torque. Beyond that it comes down to space and dimensions. In-runners tend to be long and thin where out runners are squatter and wider; hence their different operating characteristics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellis
Archie2000, why would Dave M smash up 90?
Well I know that 99.9% of people on this forum are very nice but
There has been 180(beetle) 360(fw) 540(fw) 720(fw)
I think he wants to complete the family if you get what I mean.
It was meant in a funny way but since I have no sense of humor you probably took it as an offence.
Which wasn't what it was intended for.
Happy Days :lol: